Enso Connect vs Track: Head-to-Head Comparison
TL;DR: Enso Connect and Track both target short-term rental operators. Pick **[Enso Connect](/enso-connect-review/)** if: Mid-market STR operators who want AI to answer the majority of guest messages autonomously while also running check-in, verification, and upsell flows through one branded guest app. Pick **[Track](/track-review/)** if: Enterprise PMCs that need a true CRM + contact-center stack (TrackPulse) layered on the PMS — useful for operators with inbound phone volume and outbound revenue teams.
Category: Property Management Software · Enso Connect · Track
At a glance
| Enso Connect | Track | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-powered guest-experience platform for STRs — messaging, check-in, upsells, and verification in one digital journey | Integrated PMS + CRM + contact center + distribution for enterprise vacation rental operators |
| Founded | 2021 | 2004 |
| HQ | Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Minneapolis, MN, USA |
| Pricing | from $8/mo | quote-based |
| Best for | Mid-market STR operators who want AI to answer the majority of guest messages autonomously while also running check-in, verification, and upsell flows through one branded guest app. | Enterprise PMCs that need a true CRM + contact-center stack (TrackPulse) layered on the PMS — useful for operators with inbound phone volume and outbound revenue teams. |
| Overall | 7.1/10 | 4.5/10 |
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Enso Connect | Track |
|---|---|---|
| Channel manager | — | ✅ Native |
| Unified inbox | ✅ Native | ✅ Native |
| Direct booking site | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Native |
| Task management | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Native |
| AI guest messaging | ✅ Native | ⚠️ Partial |
| AI that takes actions | ⚠️ Partial | — |
| Automation rules | ✅ Native | ✅ Native |
| Pricing optimizer | — | ⚠️ Partial |
| Open API | ✅ Native | ✅ Native |
| Mobile app | ✅ Native | ⚠️ Partial |
| Multi-calendar | — | ✅ Native |
| Accounting / reporting | — | ✅ Native |
| Revenue management | ⚠️ Partial | ⚠️ Partial |
Scores by dimension
| Dimension | Enso Connect | Track |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 7/10 🏆 | 5/10 |
| Features depth | 7/10 | 8/10 🏆 |
| Value for money | 7/10 🏆 | 4/10 |
| Support | 8/10 🏆 | 4/10 |
| AI capability | 8/10 🏆 | 3/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 🏆 |
| Learning curve | 6/10 🏆 | 3/10 |
| Pricing transparency | 7/10 🏆 | 1/10 |
Where Enso Connect wins
- Ease of use — 7/10 vs 5/10
- Value for money — 7/10 vs 4/10
- Support — 8/10 vs 4/10
- AI capability — 8/10 vs 3/10
- Learning curve — 6/10 vs 3/10
- Pricing transparency — 7/10 vs 1/10
Where Track wins
- Channel manager — native in Track, not in Enso Connect
- Multi-calendar — native in Track, not in Enso Connect
- Accounting / reporting — native in Track, not in Enso Connect
Which one should you pick?
Pick Enso Connect if: Mid-market STR operators who want AI to answer the majority of guest messages autonomously while also running check-in, verification, and upsell flows through one branded guest app. Pick Track if: Enterprise PMCs that need a true CRM + contact-center stack (TrackPulse) layered on the PMS — useful for operators with inbound phone volume and outbound revenue teams.
Pick by operator profile
| Profile | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Solo host (1-5 units) | Enso Connect | Higher profile fit (7.0 vs 3.9). |
| Boutique operator (6-20 units) | Enso Connect | Higher profile fit (7.6 vs 5.5). |
| Professional PM (20+ units) | Enso Connect | Higher profile fit (7.7 vs 6.5). |
| Enterprise (100+ units) | Enso Connect | Higher profile fit (7.8 vs 6.8). |
| Multi-market operator | Enso Connect | Higher profile fit (7.9 vs 6.6). |
| Tech-forward, AI-first | Enso Connect | Higher profile fit (8.2 vs 6.2). |
| Budget-conscious | Enso Connect | Higher profile fit (7.0 vs 3.6). |
Enso Connect in one paragraph
Enso Connect — AI-powered guest-experience platform for STRs — messaging, check-in, upsells, and verification in one digital journey. Strengths: AI messaging is a first-class product — handles routine guest questions autonomously across Airbnb/Booking/Vrbo/SMS/WhatsApp; Branded guest journey app covers pre-arrival, check-in, in-stay, and checkout in one flow; Upsells (early check-in, late checkout, mid-stay cleans, experiences) with Stripe payments built in. Weaknesses: Younger company than Duve — smaller integration library and fewer boutique-hotel features; AI responses need operator-specific training and guardrails before going autonomous. Full Enso Connect review →
Track in one paragraph
Track — Integrated PMS + CRM + contact center + distribution for enterprise vacation rental operators. Strengths: Three-module platform (TrackPMS, TrackCRM, TrackPulse contact center) — genuine call-center integration rare in category; API-first architecture — 75+ software integration partners; Trust accounting and owner portal/payouts built in. Weaknesses: Price increases without customer consent reported; Auto-renewal contracts trap customers for 12 months even when they want to leave. Full Track review →
See also
- All Property Management Software comparisons
- 5stelle vs Enso Connect
- 5stelle vs Track
- AirDNA vs Enso Connect
- AirDNA vs Track
- Amenitiz vs Enso Connect
- Amenitiz vs Track
FAQ
Is Enso Connect or Track cheaper?
Enso Connect publishes entry-level pricing; Track requires a sales call, so the answer depends on the quote you get.
Does Enso Connect have better AI than Track?
Enso Connect scores higher on ai capability — 8/10 vs 3/10.
Which is easier to use, Enso Connect or Track?
Enso Connect scores higher on ease of use — 7/10 vs 5/10.
Can I switch from Enso Connect to Track?
Yes, but plan for migration cost: channel reconnections, template rebuilds, automation recreation, and team retraining. Both Enso Connect and Track export reservation history; neither exports their automation rules cleanly. Run both in parallel for at least two weeks before cutting over.