Chekin vs Stays.net: Head-to-Head Comparison
TL;DR: Chekin and Stays.net both target short-term rental operators. Pick **[Chekin](/chekin-review/)** if: Operators in Spain (Registro de Viajeros / Parte de Viajeros), Italy (Alloggiati Web), Portugal (SEF/SEF.HOS), and France (taxe de séjour) who need automated police registration and tourist-tax reporting that would otherwise be manual, error-prone, and legally risky. Pick **[Stays.net](/stays-review/)** if: Brazilian and Latin American property managers who want a mature multi-channel PMS with native PT-BR support, local tax handling, and regional OTA integrations.
Category: Property Management Software · Chekin · Stays.net
At a glance
| Chekin | Stays.net | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Guest registration and automated tax reporting for STRs in regulated European markets | Brazilian-origin vacation rental PMS serving Latin American and European STR operators |
| Founded | 2017 | 2011 |
| HQ | Valencia, Spain | Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |
| Pricing | from $4/mo | subscription |
| Best for | Operators in Spain (Registro de Viajeros / Parte de Viajeros), Italy (Alloggiati Web), Portugal (SEF/SEF.HOS), and France (taxe de séjour) who need automated police registration and tourist-tax reporting that would otherwise be manual, error-prone, and legally risky. | Brazilian and Latin American property managers who want a mature multi-channel PMS with native PT-BR support, local tax handling, and regional OTA integrations. |
| Overall | 6.8/10 | 5.8/10 |
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Chekin | Stays.net |
|---|---|---|
| Channel manager | — | ✅ Native |
| Unified inbox | — | ✅ Native |
| Direct booking site | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Native |
| Task management | — | ✅ Native |
| AI guest messaging | — | ⚠️ Partial |
| AI that takes actions | ⚠️ Partial | — |
| Automation rules | ✅ Native | ✅ Native |
| Pricing optimizer | — | 🔌 Via integration |
| Open API | ✅ Native | ✅ Native |
| Mobile app | ✅ Native | ⚠️ Partial |
| Multi-calendar | — | ✅ Native |
| Accounting / reporting | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Native |
| Revenue management | — | ⚠️ Partial |
Scores by dimension
| Dimension | Chekin | Stays.net |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 7/10 🏆 | 6/10 |
| Features depth | 7/10 | 8/10 🏆 |
| Value for money | 8/10 🏆 | 6/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| AI capability | 5/10 🏆 | 3/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 8/10 🏆 |
| Learning curve | 6/10 🏆 | 5/10 |
| Pricing transparency | 7/10 🏆 | 3/10 |
Where Chekin wins
- Value for money — 8/10 vs 6/10
- AI capability — 5/10 vs 3/10
- Pricing transparency — 7/10 vs 3/10
Where Stays.net wins
- Channel manager — native in Stays.net, not in Chekin
- Unified inbox — native in Stays.net, not in Chekin
- Task management — native in Stays.net, not in Chekin
- Multi-calendar — native in Stays.net, not in Chekin
Which one should you pick?
Pick Chekin if: Operators in Spain (Registro de Viajeros / Parte de Viajeros), Italy (Alloggiati Web), Portugal (SEF/SEF.HOS), and France (taxe de séjour) who need automated police registration and tourist-tax reporting that would otherwise be manual, error-prone, and legally risky. Pick Stays.net if: Brazilian and Latin American property managers who want a mature multi-channel PMS with native PT-BR support, local tax handling, and regional OTA integrations.
Pick by operator profile
| Profile | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Solo host (1-5 units) | Chekin | Higher profile fit (6.8 vs 5.4). |
| Boutique operator (6-20 units) | Chekin | Higher profile fit (7.2 vs 6.4). |
| Professional PM (20+ units) | Tie | Both score within a rounding error on this profile — pick on pricing and gut. |
| Enterprise (100+ units) | Stays.net | Higher profile fit (7.3 vs 7.2). |
| Multi-market operator | Tie | Both score within a rounding error on this profile — pick on pricing and gut. |
| Tech-forward, AI-first | Chekin | Higher profile fit (7.0 vs 6.3). |
| Budget-conscious | Chekin | Higher profile fit (7.4 vs 5.3). |
Chekin in one paragraph
Chekin — Guest registration and automated tax reporting for STRs in regulated European markets. Strengths: Only guest-experience tool with deep, country-specific legal-registration coverage across Spain, Portugal, Italy, France, Germany, and more — a genuine regulatory moat; Automated filing to government portals (Registro de Viajeros, Alloggiati Web, SEF) replaces daily manual paperwork; Automated tourist-tax calculation, collection, and remittance by jurisdiction. Weaknesses: Narrow geographic sweet spot — value collapses outside regulated EU markets; Guest-experience layer (messaging, upsells) is thinner than Duve or Enso Connect — most operators pair Chekin with one of those. Full Chekin review →
Stays.net in one paragraph
Stays.net — Brazilian-origin vacation rental PMS serving Latin American and European STR operators. Strengths: Market leader in Brazil with strong PT-BR product and support; Deep channel management and unified inbox; Open API enables custom integrations. Weaknesses: Quote-based pricing — no public tiers; English-language presence and support less mature than PT/ES. Full Stays.net review →
See also
- All Property Management Software comparisons
- 5stelle vs Chekin
- 5stelle vs Stays.net
- AirDNA vs Chekin
- AirDNA vs Stays.net
- Amenitiz vs Chekin
- Amenitiz vs Stays.net
FAQ
Is Chekin or Stays.net cheaper?
Chekin publishes entry-level pricing; Stays.net requires a sales call, so the answer depends on the quote you get.
Does Chekin have better AI than Stays.net?
Chekin scores higher on ai capability — 5/10 vs 3/10.
Which is easier to use, Chekin or Stays.net?
Chekin scores higher on ease of use — 7/10 vs 6/10.
Can I switch from Chekin to Stays.net?
Yes, but plan for migration cost: channel reconnections, template rebuilds, automation recreation, and team retraining. Both Chekin and Stays.net export reservation history; neither exports their automation rules cleanly. Run both in parallel for at least two weeks before cutting over.